This June 3, 2020, photo shows a worker at the Ocean Casino Resort in Atlantic City, N.J., installing a sign indicating that slot machines will routinely be sanitized once the casino reopened a month later to prevent the spread of the coronavirus. On Jan. 24, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the casino to collect on a business interruption policy for the 3 1/2 months it was closed due to the pandemic. (AP Photo/Wayne Parry)
What to Know
- Here's a rare case of a casino losing. Atlantic City's Ocean Casino Resort was rebuffed Wednesday by the New Jersey Supreme Court in its efforts to collect on business interruption insurance involving the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The high court ruled that the presence of the virus did not constitute the kind of “direct physical loss or damage” required for such a payout. When three insurers rejected most of the casino's claim, Ocean sued.
- The casino's lawsuit against the insurers will now be dismissed. Ocean declined comment on the ruling.
New Jersey's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that an Atlantic City casino is not entitled to payouts from business interruption insurance for losses during the COVID-19 outbreak, determining that the presence of the virus did not constitute the kind of “direct physical loss or damage” required for such a payout.
The case involved the Ocean Casino Resort's claims against three insurance companies — AIG Specialty Insurance Co., American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. and Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. Those insurers largely denied payouts to the casino, saying it did not suffer direct physical loss or damage because of the virus.
The casino sued and defeated an attempt by the insurers to dismiss the case. But that decision was reversed by an appellate court.
Get top local stories in Philly delivered to you every morning. Sign up for NBC Philadelphia's News Headlines newsletter.
The high court agreed to take the case in order to resolve the legal question of what constituted loss or damage.
“Based on the plain terms of the policies, we conclude that in order to show a ‘direct physical loss’ of its property or ‘direct physical . . . damage’ to its property under the policy language at issue, (parent company AC Ocean Walk LLC) was required to demonstrate that its property was destroyed or altered in a manner that rendered it unusable or uninhabitable,” the court wrote in a unanimous decision.
“At most, it has alleged that it sustained a loss of business during the COVID-19 government-mandated suspension of business operations because it was not permitted to use its property as it would otherwise have done,” the opinion read.
Local
Breaking news and the stories that matter to your neighborhood.
It concluded that the casino's pleadings “do not support a finding that it is entitled to insurance coverage.”
The casino declined comment Wednesday.
The ruling is similar to others reached in state and federal courts around the country, including cases where payouts were denied involving a chain of California movie theaters; a Los Angeles real estate firm; a group of hotels in Pennsylvania; and a group of hotels and a law firm in New Jersey.
During arguments in September before the Supreme Court, Stephen Orlofsky, a lawyer for Ocean, said the casino took several steps to respond to the virus, including employing air filtration systems and using “industrial-strength” cleaning supplies.
But David Roth, a lawyer for American Guarantee, said the policies require there to be physical damage to the property, which he said did not occur at the casino. He said 14 state Supreme Courts around the nation have held that the mere interruption of business activity during the pandemic does not constitute physical losses.
Ocean maintained that in addition to an order by Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy closing the casinos for 3 1/2 months in 2020, it also shut down because of “the concern that the virus was having on the physical surfaces and the air” inside the casino.
